RZG vs. VIOG
RZG (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF) and VIOG (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - RZG tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth while VIOG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RZG returned 10.19%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for VIOG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RZG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VIOG.
Performance
RZG vs. VIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RZG achieves a 29.59% return, which is significantly higher than VIOG's 23.15% return. Over the past 10 years, RZG has underperformed VIOG with an annualized return of 10.19%, while VIOG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.07% annualized return.
RZG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 23.45%
- YTD
- 29.59%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
VIOG
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- YTD
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
RZG vs. VIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 29.59% | 10.22% | 9.84% | 19.15% | -29.00% | 21.01% | 17.76% | 14.25% | -8.70% | 19.18% |
VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 23.15% | 5.40% | 9.23% | 16.92% | -21.14% | 22.49% | 19.68% | 21.16% | -4.57% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between RZG and VIOG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between RZG and VIOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
RZG vs. VIOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RZG
VIOG
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Healthcare
RZG
VIOG
Industrials
RZG
VIOG
Technology
RZG
VIOG
Financial Services
RZG
VIOG
Consumer Cyclical
RZG
VIOG
Consumer Defensive
RZG
VIOG
Real Estate
RZG
VIOG
Communication Services
RZG
VIOG
Energy
RZG
VIOG
Basic Materials
RZG
VIOG
Utilities
RZG
VIOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RZG vs. VIOG — Risk / Return Rank
RZG
VIOG
RZG vs. VIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RZG | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.27 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 3.10 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 10.61 | +3.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RZG vs. VIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZG drawdown since its inception was -58.52%, which is greater than VIOG's maximum drawdown of -41.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZG and VIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RZG | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.52% | -41.73% | -16.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | -9.03% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.73% | -27.35% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.33% | -29.15% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.02% | -41.73% | -12.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | -2.97% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -7.57% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.63% | -0.05% |
Volatility
RZG vs. VIOG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) at 4.43%. This indicates that RZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RZG | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 4.43% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | 13.05% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.06% | 17.89% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 21.52% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 22.82% | +1.80% |
RZG vs. VIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RZG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOG's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RZG vs. VIOG - Dividend Comparison
RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VIOG's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.37% | 0.95% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.70% |
VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 0.76% | 1.04% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 1.09% | 0.76% | 0.87% | 0.92% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, RZG and VIOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RZG has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to VIOG (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZG dropped -58.52% vs VIOG's -41.73%.
On 10-year performance, VIOG leads with 11.07% vs 10.19% for RZG. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VIOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIOG has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZG.
VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.43% for RZG.
RZG tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth, while VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZG and 0.15% for VIOG.
RZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RZG and VIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer