RYCEY vs. KULR
RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) and KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) are both stocks. RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while KULR operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, RYCEY returned 68.92%/yr vs -30.52%/yr for KULR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RYCEY vs. KULR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 15.83% return, which is significantly higher than KULR's -6.76% return.
RYCEY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 111.25%
- 5Y*
- 68.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.47%
KULR
- 1D
- 4.94%
- 1M
- -30.30%
- 6M
- -33.97%
- YTD
- -6.76%
- 1Y
- -60.00%
- 3Y*
- -29.83%
- 5Y*
- -30.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.48%
RYCEY vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 15.83% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -20.20% |
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | -6.76% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -42.31% | 136.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCEY and KULR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, RYCEY and KULR have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
RYCEY:
$150.95B
KULR:
$127.67M
RYCEY:
£0.99
KULR:
-$1.53
RYCEY:
2.83
KULR:
6.90
RYCEY:
41.62
KULR:
0.90
RYCEY:
£40.04B
KULR:
$16.17M
RYCEY:
£10.10B
KULR:
$770.97K
RYCEY:
£8.04B
KULR:
-$60.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCEY vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank
RYCEY
KULR
RYCEY vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYCEY | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.93 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | -0.85 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | -1.22 | +5.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYCEY vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, roughly equal to the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and KULR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCEY | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -97.23% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.75% | -71.06% | +49.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -94.74% | +71.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.01% | -96.86% | +34.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.01% | -92.81% | +15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.09% | -66.54% | -17.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 49.07% | -41.24% |
Volatility
RYCEY vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) is 8.23%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 27.42%. This indicates that RYCEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYCEY | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 27.42% | -19.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.05% | 75.15% | -42.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.40% | 98.43% | -60.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.23% | 126.48% | -83.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.27% | 126.74% | -77.47% |
Dividends
RYCEY vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison
RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
Financials
RYCEY vs. KULR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and KULR Technology Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RYCEY and KULR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (27.42%) compared to RYCEY (8.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs KULR's -97.23%.
RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYCEY and KULR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer