PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RXL vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RXL vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has outperformed USL with an annualized return of 11.97%, while USL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.57% annualized return.


RXL

1D
6.28%
1M
8.64%
YTD
-5.87%
6M
-4.29%
1Y
24.14%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
11.97%

USL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
60.58%
6M
56.11%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXL vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
-5.87%19.76%-2.72%-3.15%-15.26%48.06%19.24%40.40%3.38%46.92%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
60.58%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RXL and USL is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.16

The correlation between RXL and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RXL vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RXL
USL

Healthcare

78.5%

-

Financial Services

12.0%
4.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

RXL
78.5%
USL

-

Financial Services

RXL
12.0%
USL
4.5%

Basic Materials

RXL

-

USL

-

Communication Services

RXL

-

USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

RXL

-

USL

-

Consumer Defensive

RXL

-

USL

-

Energy

RXL

-

USL

-

Industrials

RXL

-

USL

-

Real Estate

RXL

-

USL

-

Technology

RXL

-

USL

-

Utilities

RXL

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RXL vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXL
RXL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXL vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RXLUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.39

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

6.85

-4.18

RXL vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXL and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RXLUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.99

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.57

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.33

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.01

+0.40

Drawdowns

RXL vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RXLUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.70%

-89.06%

+21.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.33%

-16.76%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.08%

-23.33%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-33.82%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.00%

-66.02%

+15.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.45%

-39.10%

+24.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.86%

-61.45%

+45.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.05%

8.27%

+0.78%

Volatility

RXL vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) have volatilities of 10.34% and 10.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RXLUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.34%

10.57%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.51%

23.34%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.16%

28.59%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.73%

30.09%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.28%

32.34%

+0.94%

RXL vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

RXL vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
1.54%1.43%1.22%0.18%0.32%0.10%0.15%0.27%0.32%0.11%0.12%0.93%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RXL and USL have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to RXL (10.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXL dropped -67.70% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, RXL leads with 11.97% vs 10.57% for USL. On fees, USL is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, RXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RXL has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 10.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USL is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXL.

RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

RXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%), while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RXL and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RXL and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer