RXL vs. XLV
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV).
RXL and XLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RXL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. XLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Health Care Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both RXL and XLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RXL vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RXL vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | -9.67% | 19.76% | -2.72% | -3.15% | -15.26% | 48.06% | 19.24% | 40.40% | 3.38% | 46.92% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -4.18% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -9.67% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 12.77%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.80% annualized return.
RXL
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -12.90%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- 1Y
- 0.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- -4.18%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RXL vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RXL vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
RXL
XLV
RXL vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RXL | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 0.28 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.28 | 0.51 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.06 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 0.28 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 0.58 | -0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RXL | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.28 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.45 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.59 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RXL and XLV is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RXL vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than XLV's 1.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | 1.61% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.18% | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.93% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.70% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
RXL vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and XLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXL | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.70% | -39.17% | -28.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.73% | -10.76% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | -17.11% | -18.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | -28.40% | -22.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.90% | -7.41% | -10.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -7.12% | -8.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.68% | 5.11% | +6.57% |
Volatility
RXL vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.79%. This indicates that RXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RXL | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | 4.79% | +4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.60% | 10.29% | +10.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.51% | 17.73% | +17.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 14.56% | +14.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.19% | 16.53% | +16.66% |