PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RXL vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RXL vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RXL vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
-11.22%19.76%-2.72%-3.15%-15.26%48.06%19.24%40.40%3.38%46.92%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
-13.35%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -11.22% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 12.57%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 29.40% annualized return.


RXL

1D
3.92%
1M
-16.20%
YTD
-11.22%
6M
8.56%
1Y
-3.95%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
12.57%

QLD

1D
6.72%
1M
-10.26%
YTD
-13.35%
6M
-11.03%
1Y
37.53%
3Y*
35.41%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
29.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RXL vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RXL and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

RXL vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXL
RXL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXL vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RXLQLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

0.84

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.09

1.43

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.20

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

1.49

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.24

4.88

-5.12

RXL vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXL Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXL and QLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RXLQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

0.84

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.34

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.66

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.53

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between RXL and QLD is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RXL vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
1.64%1.43%1.22%0.18%0.32%0.10%0.15%0.27%0.32%0.11%0.12%0.93%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.19%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Drawdowns

RXL vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and QLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RXLQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.70%

-83.13%

+15.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.73%

-25.13%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-63.68%

+27.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.00%

-63.68%

+12.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.31%

-20.10%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-18.30%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.51%

7.67%

+4.84%

Volatility

RXL vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) is 9.36%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that RXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RXLQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

12.96%

-3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

25.55%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.48%

44.91%

-9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.33%

44.77%

-15.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.19%

44.47%

-11.28%