RXL vs. FTEC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).

RXL and FTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RXL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both RXL and FTEC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RXL vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RXL vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care	-9.67%	19.76%	-2.72%	-3.15%	-15.26%	48.06%	19.24%	40.40%	3.38%	46.92%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	-6.12%	22.11%	29.40%	53.30%	-29.59%	30.49%	45.83%	48.93%	-0.39%	36.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -9.67% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's -6.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 12.77%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.28% annualized return.

RXL

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -12.90%
• YTD: -9.67%
• 6M: 4.12%
• 1Y: 0.69%
• 3Y*: 4.08%
• 5Y*: 4.05%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

FTEC

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: -3.61%
• YTD: -6.12%
• 6M: -5.70%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: 23.47%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: 21.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXL vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.

RXL

ProShares Ultra Health Care

FTEC

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

Return for Risk

RXL vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXL

RXL Risk / Return Rank: 12
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FTEC

FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 63
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXL vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RXL	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	1.10	-1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	1.69	-1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.24	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	1.92	-2.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.19	5.93	-6.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RXL vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXL and FTEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RXL	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02	1.10	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.60	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.87	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.86	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between RXL and FTEC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RXL vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than FTEC's 0.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care	1.61%	1.43%	1.22%	0.18%	0.32%	0.10%	0.15%	0.27%	0.32%	0.11%	0.12%	0.93%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	0.45%	0.43%	0.49%	0.77%	0.93%	0.63%	0.83%	1.03%	1.20%	0.96%	1.25%	1.27%

Drawdowns

RXL vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and FTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RXL	FTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.70%	-34.95%	-32.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.73%	-16.26%	-6.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.08%	-34.95%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.00%	-34.95%	-16.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.90%	-11.53%	-6.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-5.61%	-10.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.68%	5.27%	+6.41%

Volatility

RXL vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 8.01%. This indicates that RXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RXL	FTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.47%	8.01%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.60%	16.40%	+4.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.51%	27.53%	+7.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.34%	25.11%	+4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.19%	24.57%	+8.62%