RXL vs. MVV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RXL (ProShares Ultra Health Care) and MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - RXL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%) while MVV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXL returned 12.72%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for MVV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

RXL vs. MVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -4.01% return, which is significantly lower than MVV's 28.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has underperformed MVV with an annualized return of 12.72%, while MVV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.

RXL

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 9.11%
• YTD: -4.01%
• 6M: -2.59%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 2.58%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

MVV

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 7.43%
• YTD: 28.55%
• 6M: 24.94%
• 1Y: 46.23%
• 3Y*: 20.57%
• 5Y*: 6.68%
• 10Y*: 14.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXL vs. MVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care	-4.01%	19.76%	-2.72%	-3.15%	-15.26%	48.06%	19.24%	40.40%	3.38%	46.92%
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	28.55%	3.48%	17.75%	22.51%	-31.96%	48.57%	6.20%	49.50%	-25.44%	30.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RXL and MVV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between RXL and MVV has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RXL vs. MVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RXL	MVV
Healthcare	78.0%	8.7%
Financial Services	11.8%	14.3%
Basic Materials	-	4.8%
Communication Services	-	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.7%
Energy	-	5.5%
Industrials	-	25.1%
Real Estate	-	7.5%
Technology	-	15.8%
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

RXL vs. MVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXL

RXL Risk / Return Rank: 23
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 21

MVV

MVV Risk / Return Rank: 51
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXL vs. MVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RXL	MVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	1.46	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	2.09	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.25	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	2.63	-1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.28	9.01	-6.73

RXL vs. MVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the MVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXL and MVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RXL vs. MVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, smaller than the maximum MVV drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and MVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RXL	MVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.70%	-85.54%	+17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.33%	-17.68%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.08%	-44.80%	+8.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.08%	-45.53%	+9.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.00%	-69.19%	+18.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.76%	0.00%	-12.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-20.52%	+4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.17%	5.16%	+4.01%

Volatility

RXL vs. MVV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) have volatilities of 10.03% and 9.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RXL	MVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.03%	9.98%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.39%	23.46%	-2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.32%	31.91%	-1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.72%	39.74%	-10.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.30%	42.40%	-9.10%

RXL vs. MVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RXL and MVV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

RXL vs. MVV - Dividend Comparison

RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than MVV's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	0.66%	0.77%	0.39%	0.77%	0.93%	0.16%	0.29%	0.62%	0.62%	0.21%	0.43%	0.17%
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care	1.51%	1.43%	1.22%	0.18%	0.32%	0.10%	0.15%	0.27%	0.32%	0.11%	0.12%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RXL and MVV in my portfolio?

RXL and MVV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RXL or MVV?

RXL has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to MVV (9.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXL dropped -67.70% vs MVV's -85.54%.

Which ETF is better, RXL or MVV?

On 10-year performance, MVV leads with 14.23% vs 12.72% for RXL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RXL or MVV?

Over the 10-year period, MVV has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RXL or MVV?

RXL and MVV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RXL or MVV?

RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.66% for MVV.

What is the main difference between RXL and MVV?

RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%), while MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.