RXI vs. FSTA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RXI is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXI returned 9.76%/yr vs 7.57%/yr for FSTA. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FSTA.

Performance

RXI vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly lower than FSTA's 5.79% return. Over the past 10 years, RXI has outperformed FSTA with an annualized return of 9.76%, while FSTA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.57% annualized return.

RXI

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: -3.90%
• 6M: -3.55%
• 1Y: 5.51%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 4.22%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

FSTA

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 4.33%
• 1Y: 1.01%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXI vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	-3.90%	13.16%	17.26%	27.57%	-29.08%	16.32%	24.46%	26.78%	-6.30%	22.94%
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	5.79%	1.82%	13.31%	2.29%	-1.72%	17.44%	10.96%	26.84%	-8.49%	12.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RXI and FSTA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between RXI and FSTA has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RXI vs. FSTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RXI	FSTA
Consumer Cyclical	95.1%	1.8%
Technology	3.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	97.3%
Industrials	0.2%	0.3%
Communication Services	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.3%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RXI vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXI

RXI Risk / Return Rank: 13
RXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RXI Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RXI Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FSTA

FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 9
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXI vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RXI	FSTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	0.08	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	0.21	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.02	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	0.11	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.10	0.22	+0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RXI vs. FSTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the FSTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXI and FSTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RXI	FSTA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34	0.08	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.46	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.52	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.61	-0.21

Drawdowns

RXI vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than FSTA's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and FSTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RXI	FSTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.36%	-25.13%	-35.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-9.29%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.64%	-11.76%	-7.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.78%	-16.58%	-19.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.78%	-25.13%	-10.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.64%	-8.55%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.54%	-3.55%	-6.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.02%	4.54%	+0.48%

Volatility

RXI vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) at 4.08%. This indicates that RXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RXI	FSTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.06%	4.08%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	9.77%	+2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.38%	12.38%	+4.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	13.11%	+7.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.13%	14.56%	+5.57%

RXI vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

RXI vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison

RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than FSTA's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	2.25%	2.34%	2.25%	2.66%	2.26%	2.15%	2.47%	2.46%	3.01%	2.42%	2.53%	2.86%
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.62%	1.55%	1.07%	1.00%	1.00%	0.89%	0.65%	1.48%	1.73%	1.26%	1.77%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RXI and FSTA in my portfolio?

RXI and FSTA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RXI or FSTA?

RXI has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to FSTA (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs FSTA's -25.13%.

Which ETF is better, RXI or FSTA?

On 10-year performance, RXI leads with 9.76% vs 7.57% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FSTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RXI or FSTA?

Over the 10-year period, RXI has performed better with a 9.76% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RXI or FSTA?

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RXI or FSTA?

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.62% for RXI.

What is the main difference between RXI and FSTA?

RXI is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FSTA is Consumer Staples Equities. RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.08% for FSTA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.