RXI vs. FDIS

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index while FDIS tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXI returned 9.54%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for FDIS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.

Performance

RXI vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -5.30% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's -2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RXI has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 9.54%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.

RXI

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -3.50%
• YTD: -5.30%
• 6M: -5.40%
• 1Y: 6.34%
• 3Y*: 10.39%
• 5Y*: 3.92%
• 10Y*: 9.54%

FDIS

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: -3.73%
• YTD: -2.32%
• 6M: -2.53%
• 1Y: 10.79%
• 3Y*: 13.86%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 13.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXI vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	-5.30%	13.16%	17.26%	27.57%	-29.08%	16.32%	24.46%	26.78%	-6.30%	22.94%
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	-2.32%	5.67%	24.43%	40.48%	-35.23%	24.25%	49.50%	27.44%	-0.88%	22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RXI and FDIS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.92

The correlation between RXI and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

RXI vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RXI	FDIS
Consumer Cyclical	95.1%	96.9%
Technology	3.7%	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	1.0%
Industrials	0.2%	0.8%
Communication Services	0.2%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RXI vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXI

RXI Risk / Return Rank: 15
RXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
RXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RXI Omega Ratio Rank: 15
RXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
RXI Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 19
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXI vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RXI	FDIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	0.59	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	0.95	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.11	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	0.70	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.25	2.18	-0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RXI vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXI and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RXI	FDIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	0.59	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.25	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.60	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.60	-0.20

Drawdowns

RXI vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and FDIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RXI	FDIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.36%	-39.16%	-21.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-15.50%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.64%	-27.43%	+7.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.78%	-39.16%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.78%	-39.16%	+3.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.98%	-6.81%	-2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.54%	-7.49%	-3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.07%	4.95%	+0.12%

Volatility

RXI vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is 4.63%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that RXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RXI	FDIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	5.29%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.50%	13.17%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.48%	18.48%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	23.88%	-2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.13%	22.30%	-2.17%

RXI vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

RXI vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than FDIS's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.74%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.64%	1.55%	1.07%	1.00%	1.00%	0.89%	0.65%	1.48%	1.73%	1.26%	1.77%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RXI and FDIS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, RXI and FDIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RXI or FDIS?

FDIS has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to RXI (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

Which ETF is better, RXI or FDIS?

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.44% vs 9.54% for RXI. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RXI has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RXI or FDIS?

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 9.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RXI or FDIS?

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RXI or FDIS?

RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.74% for FDIS.

What is the main difference between RXI and FDIS?

RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.08% for FDIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.