RXI vs. FDIS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS).
RXI and FDIS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index. It was launched on Sep 21, 2006. FDIS is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both RXI and FDIS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RXI or FDIS.
Correlation
The correlation between RXI and FDIS is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RXI vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RXI:
1.14
FDIS:
1.44
RXI:
1.62
FDIS:
1.95
RXI:
1.20
FDIS:
1.25
RXI:
1.08
FDIS:
1.62
RXI:
5.29
FDIS:
7.37
RXI:
3.43%
FDIS:
3.54%
RXI:
15.93%
FDIS:
18.18%
RXI:
-60.36%
FDIS:
-39.16%
RXI:
-3.14%
FDIS:
-4.17%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a 18.60% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's 27.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RXI has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 9.37%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.
RXI
18.60%
3.71%
16.28%
19.03%
9.31%
9.37%
FDIS
27.32%
4.41%
24.22%
26.74%
16.75%
14.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RXI vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RXI vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RXI vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than FDIS's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.06% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% | 1.71% | 1.21% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.68% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% | 1.01% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
RXI vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and FDIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RXI vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is 4.85%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that RXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.