RXI vs. IBUY
RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index while IBUY tracks the EQM Online Retail Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXI returned 10.20%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for IBUY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IBUY.
Performance
RXI vs. IBUY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly higher than IBUY's -7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, RXI has underperformed IBUY with an annualized return of 10.20%, while IBUY has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.
RXI
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -6.99%
- 6M
- -8.46%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
IBUY
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- -7.94%
- 6M
- -8.98%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.00%
- 5Y*
- -11.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
RXI vs. IBUY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | -6.99% | 13.16% | 17.26% | 27.57% | -29.08% | 16.32% | 24.46% | 26.78% | -6.30% | 22.94% |
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -7.94% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -1.93% | 50.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXI and IBUY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between RXI and IBUY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
RXI vs. IBUY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RXI
IBUY
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RXI
IBUY
Technology
RXI
IBUY
Consumer Defensive
RXI
IBUY
Industrials
RXI
IBUY
Communication Services
RXI
IBUY
Basic Materials
RXI
-
IBUY
-
Energy
RXI
-
IBUY
-
Financial Services
RXI
-
IBUY
Healthcare
RXI
-
IBUY
Real Estate
RXI
-
IBUY
Utilities
RXI
-
IBUY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXI vs. IBUY — Risk / Return Rank
RXI
IBUY
RXI vs. IBUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXI | IBUY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.11 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.79 | 0.23 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXI vs. IBUY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, smaller than the maximum IBUY drawdown of -73.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and IBUY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXI | IBUY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.36% | -73.00% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -23.23% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.64% | -28.87% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | -71.15% | +35.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | -73.00% | +37.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.60% | -50.69% | +40.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -29.76% | +19.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 11.04% | -5.63% |
Volatility
RXI vs. IBUY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is 5.84%, while Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that RXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBUY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXI | IBUY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 7.31% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 16.83% | -3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 21.96% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 32.15% | -11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 29.18% | -9.09% |
RXI vs. IBUY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than IBUY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXI vs. IBUY - Dividend Comparison
RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than IBUY's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.50% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXI and IBUY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBUY has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to RXI (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs IBUY's -73.00%.
On 10-year performance, IBUY leads with 11.67% vs 10.20% for RXI. On fees, RXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, RXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IBUY has performed better with a 11.67% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.65% for IBUY.
RXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXI and IBUY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer