PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RXI vs. BETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RXI vs. BETZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index while BETZ tracks the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RXI returned 3.14%/yr vs -8.92%/yr for BETZ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.

Performance

RXI vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -12.27% return.

RXI

1D
-1.22%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-6.99%
6M
-8.46%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
10.20%

BETZ

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-12.27%
6M
-12.37%
1Y
-16.13%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
-8.92%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXI vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RXI
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF		-6.99%13.16%17.26%27.57%-29.08%16.32%28.30%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF		-12.27%15.75%10.22%21.17%-42.02%-3.91%65.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RXI and BETZ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between RXI and BETZ has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RXI vs. BETZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RXI
BETZ

Consumer Cyclical

95.0%
96.0%

Technology

3.9%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Communication Services

0.1%
1.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RXI
95.0%
BETZ
96.0%

Technology

RXI
3.9%
BETZ
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

RXI
0.8%
BETZ

-

Industrials

RXI
0.2%
BETZ

-

Communication Services

RXI
0.1%
BETZ
1.1%

Basic Materials

RXI

-

BETZ

-

Energy

RXI

-

BETZ

-

Financial Services

RXI

-

BETZ
0.0%

Healthcare

RXI

-

BETZ

-

Real Estate

RXI

-

BETZ

-

Utilities

RXI

-

BETZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF

Often compared with RXI:
RXI vs. KXIRXI vs. VCRRXI vs. XLPRXI vs. IEDIRXI vs. IBUYRXI vs. FDISRXI vs. VT
Often compared with BETZ:
BETZ vs. FDISBETZ vs. ODDSBETZ vs. MGMBETZ vs. HTECBETZ vs. SPYBETZ vs. QQQBETZ vs. BRK-B

Return for Risk

RXI vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RXI
RXI Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXI vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RXIBETZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.26
-0.79

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.48
-1.02

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.89

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.55

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

-0.91

+1.70

RXI vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the BETZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXI and BETZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RXI vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, roughly equal to the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and BETZ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RXIBETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.36%

-60.82%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-29.20%

+14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.64%

-29.20%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.78%

-59.79%

+24.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.60%

-40.65%

+30.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.53%

-33.83%

+23.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

17.72%

-12.31%

Volatility

RXI vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is 5.84%, while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that RXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RXIBETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

6.98%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

16.65%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.69%

20.62%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

26.99%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

27.94%

-7.85%

RXI vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RXI vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than BETZ's 5.21% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF		5.21%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RXI
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF		1.50%1.55%1.07%1.00%1.00%0.89%0.65%1.48%1.73%1.26%1.77%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

RXI and BETZ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BETZ has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to RXI (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs BETZ's -60.82%.

On 5-year performance, RXI leads with 3.14% vs -8.92% for BETZ. On fees, RXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, RXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RXI has performed better with a 3.14% return vs -8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.

BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.21%, compared with 1.50% for RXI.

RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.75% for BETZ.

RXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RXI and BETZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer