RWIN vs. IPOS
RWIN (Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. RWIN is actively managed, while IPOS is passively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RWIN charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
RWIN vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RWIN
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IPOS
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- 6M
- 25.09%
- YTD
- 38.69%
- 1Y
- 53.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- -6.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $101.01K | $73.10K | $105.19K | |
| $5.81K | $6.02K | $8.35K |
RWIN vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 6.52% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 24.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWIN and IPOS is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWIN vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
RWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IPOS
RWIN vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWIN | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWIN vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWIN drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIN and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWIN | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -73.09% | +69.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -41.06% | +41.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -32.10% | +30.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.72% | — |
Volatility
RWIN vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWIN | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 34.33% | -19.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 28.21% | -13.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 24.63% | -9.89% |
RWIN vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWIN has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWIN vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
RWIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than IPOS's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.34% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWIN and IPOS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RWIN is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RWIN is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
RWIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.34% for IPOS.
They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for RWIN and 0.80% for IPOS.
Find the right allocation for RWIN and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer