RWIN vs. RWEM
RWIN (Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF) and RWEM (Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWIN is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Rayliant, while RWEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FT Wilshire Emerging Large NxtGen Index. RWIN is actively managed, while RWEM is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RWIN charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RWEM.
Performance
RWIN vs. RWEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RWIN
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWEM
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- YTD
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- 34.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWIN vs. RWEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 3.27% |
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 16.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWIN and RWEM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWIN vs. RWEM — Risk / Return Rank
RWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RWEM
RWIN vs. RWEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) and Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWIN | RWEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWIN vs. RWEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWIN drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, smaller than the maximum RWEM drawdown of -26.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIN and RWEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWIN | RWEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -26.92% | +22.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.89% | +8.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -9.56% | +8.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.35% | — |
Volatility
RWIN vs. RWEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWIN | RWEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 35.97% | -21.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 22.56% | -7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 22.56% | -7.60% |
RWIN vs. RWEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWIN has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than RWEM's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWIN vs. RWEM - Dividend Comparison
RWIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than RWEM's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.82% | 2.15% | 3.59% | 1.60% | 5.59% | 0.39% |
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWIN and RWEM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RWIN is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RWIN is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RWEM.
RWEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.01% for RWIN.
RWIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while RWEM is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for RWIN and 0.52% for RWEM.
Find the right allocation for RWIN and RWEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer