RWIN vs. CNQQ
RWIN (Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF) and CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWIN is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Rayliant, while CNQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. RWIN is actively managed, while CNQQ is passively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RWIN charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNQQ.
Performance
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RWIN
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CNQQ
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $711.37K | $443.55K | $514.47K | |
| $5.81K | $6.02K | $8.35K |
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 6.52% |
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 11.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWIN and CNQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWIN drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, smaller than the maximum CNQQ drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIN and CNQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWIN | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -17.82% | +13.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.52% | +10.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -8.59% | +7.40% |
Volatility
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWIN | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 27.84% | -13.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 27.84% | -13.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 27.84% | -13.10% |
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWIN has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CNQQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Dividend Comparison
RWIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than CNQQ's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 0.39% | 0.09% |
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWIN and CNQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RWIN is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RWIN is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.
RWIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.39% for CNQQ.
RWIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CNQQ is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for RWIN and 0.75% for CNQQ.
Find the right allocation for RWIN and CNQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer