RWIN vs. CNQQ
RWIN (Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF) and CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWIN is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Rayliant, while CNQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. RWIN is actively managed, while CNQQ is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWIN charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNQQ.
Performance
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RWIN
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNQQ
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 3.27% |
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 18.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWIN and CNQQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWIN drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, smaller than the maximum CNQQ drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIN and CNQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWIN | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -17.82% | +13.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.12% | +5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -8.43% | +7.09% |
Volatility
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWIN | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 27.03% | -12.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 27.03% | -12.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 27.03% | -12.07% |
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWIN has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CNQQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWIN vs. CNQQ - Dividend Comparison
RWIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than CNQQ's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 0.34% | 0.09% |
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 1.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWIN and CNQQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RWIN is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RWIN is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.
RWIN has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.34% for CNQQ.
RWIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CNQQ is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for RWIN and 0.75% for CNQQ.
Find the right allocation for RWIN and CNQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer