RWIN vs. IDHQ
RWIN (Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF) and IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWIN is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Rayliant, while IDHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. RWIN is actively managed, while IDHQ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RWIN charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IDHQ.
Performance
RWIN vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RWIN
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IDHQ
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- YTD
- 28.92%
- 1Y
- 42.54%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.18M | $6.44M | $5.74M | |
| $5.81K | $6.02K | $8.35K |
RWIN vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 6.52% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 25.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWIN and IDHQ is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWIN vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank
RWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDHQ
RWIN vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWIN | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWIN vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWIN drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIN and IDHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWIN | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -73.84% | +69.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -21.02% | +19.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.35% | — |
Volatility
RWIN vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWIN | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 20.71% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 17.87% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 17.98% | -3.24% |
RWIN vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWIN has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWIN vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison
RWIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than IDHQ's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 1.96% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
RWIN Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWIN and IDHQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for RWIN.
IDHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.97% for RWIN.
RWIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDHQ is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for RWIN and 0.29% for IDHQ.
Find the right allocation for RWIN and IDHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer