RUSG.L vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RUSG.L (Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - RUSG.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Net Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RUSG.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

RUSG.L vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RUSG.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 6.78%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 24.63%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 18.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RUSG.L vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	24.09%	43.28%	-30.45%	29.15%	38.14%	35.28%	-2.66%	30.31%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.78%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RUSG.L and SCHG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2014	0.50

The correlation between RUSG.L and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RUSG.L vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RUSG.L	SCHG
Technology	49.3%	46.3%
Consumer Cyclical	14.8%	12.7%
Communication Services	14.0%	16.0%
Financial Services	6.7%	6.7%
Healthcare	6.5%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	1.7%
Industrials	3.5%	5.8%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.4%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.5%
Energy	0.4%	0.8%
Utilities	0.3%	0.4%

Return for Risk

RUSG.L vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUSG.L vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RUSG.L	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.85	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RUSG.L	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.44%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.20%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RUSG.L	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.49%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.26%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.55%	—

RUSG.L vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RUSG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

RUSG.L vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

RUSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RUSG.L and SCHG in my portfolio?

RUSG.L and SCHG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RUSG.L or SCHG?

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RUSG.L or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for RUSG.L.

What is the main difference between RUSG.L and SCHG?

RUSG.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth Net Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for RUSG.L and 0.04% for SCHG.