RUSG.L vs. IWF
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).
RUSG.L and IWF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RUSG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Net Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2011. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both RUSG.L and IWF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RUSG.L or IWF.
Key characteristics
| RUSG.L | IWF |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between RUSG.L and IWF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RUSG.L vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RUSG.L vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RUSG.L and IWF have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RUSG.L vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RUSG.L vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
RUSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 1.33% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
RUSG.L vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
RUSG.L vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) is 0.00%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that RUSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.