RUSG.L vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
RUSG.L and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RUSG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Net Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2011. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both RUSG.L and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RUSG.L or QQQ.
Key characteristics
| RUSG.L | QQQ |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between RUSG.L and QQQ is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RUSG.L vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RUSG.L vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RUSG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RUSG.L vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RUSG.L vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
RUSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.59% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
RUSG.L vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
RUSG.L vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) is 0.00%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that RUSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.