RTH vs. BETZ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ).
RTH and BETZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. Both RTH and BETZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RTH vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTH vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.11% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 21.60% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -13.39% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 60.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -13.39% return.
RTH
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 12.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
BETZ
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 6M
- -19.50%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- -9.33%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTH vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
BETZ
RTH vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTH | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.04 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.23 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.03 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 0.04 | +1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 0.08 | +5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTH | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.04 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | -0.34 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.11 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and BETZ is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RTH vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than BETZ's 5.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.96% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.28% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and BETZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -60.82% | +18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -29.20% | +20.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -60.82% | +35.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.34% | -41.41% | +36.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -33.65% | +26.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 14.15% | -11.80% |
Volatility
RTH vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 4.55%, while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 8.24% | -3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.86% | 15.73% | -6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 23.04% | -8.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 27.26% | -10.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 28.13% | -10.61% |