RSPS vs. XLG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.16%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for XLG. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

RSPS vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 4.16%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.68% annualized return.

RSPS

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 6.59%
• 1Y: 3.58%
• 3Y*: -0.19%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 4.16%

XLG

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: 4.39%
• YTD: 4.93%
• 1Y: 18.75%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 14.26%
• 10Y*: 16.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPS vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	6.59%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	4.93%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and XLG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.50

The correlation between RSPS and XLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPS vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPS	XLG
Consumer Defensive	97.1%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	10.1%
Financial Services	0.0%	9.9%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Communication Services	-	13.9%
Energy	-	2.2%
Healthcare	-	6.7%
Industrials	-	2.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	48.7%
Utilities	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

RSPS vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 13
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 12

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 43
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPS vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPS	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	1.33	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	1.86	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.24	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	1.50	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.51	5.04	-4.53

RSPS vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPS	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.93%	-52.39%	+16.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.72%	-12.41%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-20.70%	+4.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	-28.02%	+9.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.42%	-30.46%	+5.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.94%	-3.86%	-3.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-7.63%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	3.69%	+2.92%

Volatility

RSPS vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.00%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPS	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	5.00%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	11.00%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.35%	14.06%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	18.81%	-5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	18.86%	-3.93%

RSPS vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPS vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than XLG's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.92%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.64%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPS and XLG in my portfolio?

RSPS and XLG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPS or XLG?

RSPS has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to XLG (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, RSPS or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.68% vs 4.16% for RSPS. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPS or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPS or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPS or XLG?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.64% for XLG.

What is the main difference between RSPS and XLG?

RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.