RSPS vs. VGT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.45%/yr vs 24.06%/yr for VGT. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

RSPS vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 4.45%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.

RSPS

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: 0.99%
• YTD: 8.07%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: -0.24%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: 4.45%
• ALL TIME*: 8.54%

VGT

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -1.30%
• 6M: 21.30%
• YTD: 20.36%
• 1Y: 34.81%
• 3Y*: 26.48%
• 5Y*: 17.81%
• 10Y*: 24.06%
• ALL TIME*: 14.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	$3.23M	$2.80M	$2.24M
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	$440.89M	$515.41M	$573.34M

RSPS vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	8.07%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	20.36%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	2.46%	37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and VGT is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.29
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.39

The correlation between RSPS and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPS vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPS	VGT
Consumer Defensive	97.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	0.1%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	0.5%
Energy	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	98.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPS vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 19
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 17

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 52
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPS vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPS	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	1.31	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	1.82	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.23	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	1.94	-1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.83	5.23	-4.40

RSPS vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPS	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.93%	-54.63%	+18.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.72%	-16.40%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.87%	-27.23%	+11.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	-35.07%	+16.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.42%	-35.07%	+9.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.65%	-9.93%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-7.95%	+2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.76%	6.07%	+0.69%

Volatility

RSPS vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 6.03%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPS	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	8.42%	-2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	20.14%	-8.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.87%	24.28%	-9.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.96%	25.83%	-11.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.01%	24.89%	-9.88%

RSPS vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPS vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.88%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.38%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPS and VGT in my portfolio?

RSPS and VGT have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPS or VGT?

VGT has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to RSPS (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which ETF is better, RSPS or VGT?

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.06% vs 4.45% for RSPS. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPS or VGT?

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.06% return vs 4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPS or VGT?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPS or VGT?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

What is the main difference between RSPS and VGT?

RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.09% for VGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.