PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPS vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPS vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 4.67%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


RSPS

1D
0.65%
1M
4.11%
YTD
7.30%
6M
4.56%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
0.13%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
4.67%

VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
1.35%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPS vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
7.30%-0.88%-1.47%-5.39%2.88%14.68%6.19%28.17%-10.86%14.20%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and VGT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.40

The correlation between RSPS and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPS vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPS
VGT

Consumer Defensive

97.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.5%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPS
97.1%
VGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPS
2.9%
VGT
0.1%

Financial Services

RSPS
0.0%
VGT
0.5%

Basic Materials

RSPS

-

VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

RSPS

-

VGT
0.5%

Energy

RSPS

-

VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

RSPS

-

VGT
0.0%

Industrials

RSPS

-

VGT
0.4%

Real Estate

RSPS

-

VGT

-

Technology

RSPS

-

VGT
98.5%

Utilities

RSPS

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPS vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPS
RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPS vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPSVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.36

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.94

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.77

9.11

-8.33

RSPS vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPSVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.93%

-54.63%

+18.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.72%

-16.40%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-27.23%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

-35.07%

+16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-35.07%

+9.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.32%

-7.18%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-7.95%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

5.28%

+1.01%

Volatility

RSPS vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 4.33%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPSVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

10.00%

-5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

18.00%

-7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.78%

22.00%

-8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

25.40%

-11.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

24.72%

-9.83%

RSPS vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPS vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
2.71%2.82%2.86%2.78%2.31%2.07%2.14%2.12%2.43%1.90%1.76%1.77%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPS and VGT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to RSPS (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 4.67% for RSPS. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPS and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer