RSPS vs. PAVE
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPS returned 1.38%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
RSPS vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.86% return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 0.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPS vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 7.30% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 8.97% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and PAVE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.44 |
The correlation between RSPS and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPS vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPS
PAVE
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPS
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
RSPS
PAVE
-
Financial Services
RSPS
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
RSPS
-
PAVE
Communication Services
RSPS
-
PAVE
-
Energy
RSPS
-
PAVE
Healthcare
RSPS
-
PAVE
-
Industrials
RSPS
-
PAVE
Real Estate
RSPS
-
PAVE
-
Technology
RSPS
-
PAVE
Utilities
RSPS
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
PAVE
RSPS vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.32 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 3.11 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 11.32 | -10.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -44.08% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -11.91% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -26.23% | +9.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -26.23% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -1.01% | -5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -6.23% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 3.27% | +3.02% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 4.33%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 7.35% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 15.87% | -5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 19.49% | -5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 21.70% | -8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 24.40% | -9.51% |
RSPS vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and PAVE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to RSPS (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.84% vs 1.38% for RSPS. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 1.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer