RSPS vs. GXPS
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC while GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GXPS.
Performance
RSPS vs. GXPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than GXPS's 6.95% return.
RSPS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- -0.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.63%
- 5Y*
- -0.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
GXPS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPS vs. GXPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 1.57% | -4.90% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 6.95% | -1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and GXPS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. GXPS — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
GXPS
RSPS vs. GXPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPS | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPS | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.43 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. GXPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, which is greater than GXPS's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and GXPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -9.20% | -26.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.32% | -8.14% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -3.89% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPS vs. GXPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 13.94% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 13.94% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 13.94% | +0.92% |
RSPS vs. GXPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. GXPS - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than GXPS's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.87% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and GXPS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.
RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.25% for GXPS.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and GXPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer