PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPN vs. XLII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPN vs. XLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSPN having a 11.03% return and XLII slightly higher at 11.30%.


RSPN

1D
0.31%
1M
4.48%
YTD
11.03%
6M
9.28%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
15.13%

XLII

1D
0.39%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.30%
6M
10.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPN vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSPN and XLII is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.92

RSPN vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPN
XLII

Industrials

92.1%
93.8%

Technology

3.8%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
0.3%

Utilities

1.6%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
100.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

RSPN
92.1%
XLII
93.8%

Technology

RSPN
3.8%
XLII
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPN
2.4%
XLII
0.3%

Utilities

RSPN
1.6%
XLII

-

Financial Services

RSPN
0.1%
XLII
100.8%

Basic Materials

RSPN

-

XLII

-

Communication Services

RSPN

-

XLII

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPN

-

XLII

-

Energy

RSPN

-

XLII

-

Healthcare

RSPN

-

XLII

-

Real Estate

RSPN

-

XLII

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPN vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPN
RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

XLII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPN vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPNXLIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

RSPN vs. XLII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPN vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and XLII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPNXLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.61%

-10.10%

-49.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

0.00%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-1.30%

-6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

Volatility

RSPN vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPNXLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

12.12%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

12.12%

+6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

12.12%

+8.29%

RSPN vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPN vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison

RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than XLII's 10.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
1.03%0.86%0.98%1.06%1.09%0.70%0.96%1.33%1.49%1.12%1.31%1.51%
XLII
State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
10.82%5.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RSPN and XLII move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 1.03% for RSPN.

RSPN is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.35% for XLII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPN and XLII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer