RSPC vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPC returned -0.41%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for SCHG. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

RSPC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -10.27% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 4.99% return.

RSPC

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -1.81%
• 6M: -8.40%
• YTD: -10.27%
• 1Y: -2.47%
• 3Y*: 8.82%
• 5Y*: -0.41%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.11%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 18.27%
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	$480.30K	$640.18K	$573.12K
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$247.66M	$249.87M	$339.91M

RSPC vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	-10.27%	18.44%	17.98%	17.92%	-29.00%	14.55%	22.14%	21.35%	-11.38%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.99%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-7.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPC and SCHG is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPC and SCHG has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSPC vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPC	SCHG
Communication Services	85.6%	14.1%
Technology	14.3%	44.0%
Financial Services	0.0%	7.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.9%
Energy	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	9.9%
Industrials	-	7.6%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

RSPC vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPC

RSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8
RSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPC	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	0.82	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	1.20	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.15	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	0.83	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	2.62	-3.09

RSPC vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPC and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPC	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.03%	-34.59%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.61%	-16.41%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.61%	-23.39%	+7.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.73%	-34.59%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.04%	-3.10%	-9.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-5.19%	-7.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.14%	5.19%	+1.95%

Volatility

RSPC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.32%. This indicates that RSPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPC	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	4.32%	+1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.12%	12.90%	-1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.65%	16.67%	-2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	22.42%	-3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	21.59%	-0.88%

RSPC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	1.83%	1.66%	1.03%	0.98%	1.45%	1.10%	1.05%	0.90%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPC and SCHG in my portfolio?

RSPC and SCHG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPC or SCHG?

RSPC has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to SCHG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, RSPC or SCHG?

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.15% vs -0.41% for RSPC. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPC or SCHG?

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.15% return vs -0.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPC or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPC or SCHG?

RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between RSPC and SCHG?

RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.