RSPC vs. XLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC).
RSPC and XLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. XLC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2018. Both RSPC and XLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPC or XLC.
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and XLC is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSPC vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RSPC:
2.09
XLC:
2.22
RSPC:
2.74
XLC:
2.85
RSPC:
1.36
XLC:
1.39
RSPC:
0.96
XLC:
4.48
RSPC:
10.79
XLC:
14.86
RSPC:
2.44%
XLC:
2.17%
RSPC:
12.59%
XLC:
14.46%
RSPC:
-38.03%
XLC:
-46.65%
RSPC:
-3.23%
XLC:
-0.35%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than XLC's 8.40% return.
RSPC
7.71%
8.14%
17.67%
28.75%
7.72%
N/A
XLC
8.40%
7.75%
20.54%
34.59%
14.44%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPC vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPC vs. XLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RSPC
XLC
RSPC vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPC vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than XLC's 0.92% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.99% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 1.54% | 0.24% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.81% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and XLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPC vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 2.18%, while Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that RSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.