RSPC vs. VTV
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPC returned -0.13%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for VTV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
RSPC vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.06% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 1Y
- -1.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
RSPC vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -8.48% | 18.44% | 17.98% | 17.92% | -29.00% | 14.55% | 22.14% | 21.35% | -11.38% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 16.06% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -7.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and VTV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSPC and VTV has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSPC vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPC
VTV
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
RSPC
VTV
Technology
RSPC
VTV
Financial Services
RSPC
VTV
Basic Materials
RSPC
-
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
RSPC
-
VTV
Consumer Defensive
RSPC
-
VTV
Energy
RSPC
-
VTV
Healthcare
RSPC
-
VTV
Industrials
RSPC
-
VTV
Real Estate
RSPC
-
VTV
Utilities
RSPC
-
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
VTV
RSPC vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.45 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 4.05 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 15.35 | -15.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -59.27% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -6.35% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.71% | -14.52% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.73% | -17.04% | -20.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | -0.10% | -11.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -7.83% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 1.67% | +4.83% |
Volatility
RSPC vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.09%. This indicates that RSPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 3.09% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 7.74% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 10.38% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 13.86% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 16.61% | +4.10% |
RSPC vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.79% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and VTV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPC has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to VTV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 12.36% vs -0.13% for RSPC. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.36% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.79% for RSPC.
RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer