RSP vs. XLG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).

RSP and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2003. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. Both RSP and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RSP vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSP vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	0.94%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	29.41%	12.66%	28.91%	-7.84%	18.52%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	-7.18%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -7.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 11.21%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.

RSP

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -5.49%
• YTD: 0.94%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 12.90%
• 3Y*: 11.84%
• 5Y*: 7.88%
• 10Y*: 11.21%

XLG

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: -7.18%
• 6M: -4.55%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 15.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSP vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSP and XLG have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

RSP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

XLG

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

Return for Risk

RSP vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 41
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 47

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 57
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSP	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.99	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	1.54	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.22	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	1.63	-0.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.64	5.71	-1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSP vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSP	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	0.99	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.75	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.84	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.59	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and XLG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RSP vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than XLG's 0.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.62%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.70%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Drawdowns

RSP vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSP	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.92%	-52.39%	-7.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-12.41%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.38%	-28.02%	+6.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.04%	-30.46%	-8.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.66%	-8.93%	+3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-7.69%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	3.54%	-0.74%

Volatility

RSP vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 4.40%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSP	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.40%	5.82%	-1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	10.65%	-1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.16%	19.97%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.20%	18.68%	-2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	18.81%	-0.45%