RSP vs. SPYV
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - RSP tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index while SPYV tracks the S&P 500 Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 11.86%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for SPYV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
RSP vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSP having a 11.86% annualized return and SPYV not far ahead at 11.90%.
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
RSP vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and SPYV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2003 | 0.91 |
The correlation between RSP and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSP vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
SPYV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
SPYV
Financial Services
RSP
SPYV
Industrials
RSP
SPYV
Healthcare
RSP
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
RSP
SPYV
Utilities
RSP
SPYV
Real Estate
RSP
SPYV
Energy
RSP
SPYV
Basic Materials
RSP
SPYV
Communication Services
RSP
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
SPYV
RSP vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSP | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 2.17 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 3.05 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.43 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 13.16 | -3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSP | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.17 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.75 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.70 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.42 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
RSP vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -58.45% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -6.22% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -17.54% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -17.89% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -36.89% | -2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.57% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -8.72% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.62% | +0.44% |
Volatility
RSP vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that RSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 1.98% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 7.04% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 9.84% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 14.40% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 16.94% | +1.41% |
RSP vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, RSP and SPYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RSP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.90% vs 11.86% for RSP. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer