RSP vs. SLYV
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 12.01%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for SLYV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
RSP vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 18.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 12.01%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.53% annualized return.
RSP
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 36.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
RSP vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.96% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 18.18% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and SLYV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2003 | 0.89 |
The correlation between RSP and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSP vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
SLYV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
SLYV
Financial Services
RSP
SLYV
Industrials
RSP
SLYV
Healthcare
RSP
SLYV
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
SLYV
Consumer Defensive
RSP
SLYV
Real Estate
RSP
SLYV
Utilities
RSP
SLYV
Energy
RSP
SLYV
Basic Materials
RSP
SLYV
Communication Services
RSP
SLYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
SLYV
RSP vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSP | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 3.97 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.23 | 13.17 | -3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSP vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -61.15% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -9.36% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -28.68% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -28.68% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -47.73% | +8.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -8.94% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.82% | -0.75% |
Volatility
RSP vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.55%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 4.80% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 11.74% | -3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 18.30% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 21.97% | -5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 23.96% | -5.60% |
RSP vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than SLYV's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.77% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSP and SLYV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to RSP (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 12.01% vs 10.53% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.15% for SLYV.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer