PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSP vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 18.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 12.01%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.53% annualized return.


RSP

1D
1.56%
1M
2.91%
YTD
9.96%
6M
8.60%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
12.01%

SLYV

1D
1.81%
1M
5.47%
YTD
18.18%
6M
14.15%
1Y
36.99%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSP vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.96%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
18.18%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and SLYV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2003

0.89

The correlation between RSP and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSP vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSP
SLYV

Technology

20.4%
11.3%

Financial Services

14.2%
19.8%

Industrials

14.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

10.9%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
3.8%

Real Estate

5.9%
8.7%

Utilities

5.9%
2.2%

Energy

4.2%
7.6%

Basic Materials

4.1%
7.1%

Communication Services

3.6%
4.4%

Technology

RSP
20.4%
SLYV
11.3%

Financial Services

RSP
14.2%
SLYV
19.8%

Industrials

RSP
14.1%
SLYV
11.6%

Healthcare

RSP
10.9%
SLYV
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RSP
10.1%
SLYV
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

RSP
6.4%
SLYV
3.8%

Real Estate

RSP
5.9%
SLYV
8.7%

Utilities

RSP
5.9%
SLYV
2.2%

Energy

RSP
4.2%
SLYV
7.6%

Basic Materials

RSP
4.1%
SLYV
7.1%

Communication Services

RSP
3.6%
SLYV
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSP vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.97

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

13.17

-3.93

RSP vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSP vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-61.15%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-9.36%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-28.68%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-28.68%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

-47.73%

+8.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-8.94%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.82%

-0.75%

Volatility

RSP vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.55%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

4.80%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

11.74%

-3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

18.30%

-6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

21.97%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

23.96%

-5.60%

RSP vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RSP vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than SLYV's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.77%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSP and SLYV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to RSP (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 12.01% vs 10.53% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSP and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer