RSP vs. IWY
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 12.18%/yr vs 19.59%/yr for IWY. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
RSP vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 12.18%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.59% annualized return.
RSP
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
IWY
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 24.23%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.59%
RSP vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 11.61% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 5.40% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and IWY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSP and IWY has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSP vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
IWY
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
IWY
Industrials
RSP
IWY
Financial Services
RSP
IWY
Healthcare
RSP
IWY
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
IWY
Consumer Defensive
RSP
IWY
Real Estate
RSP
IWY
Utilities
RSP
IWY
Energy
RSP
IWY
Basic Materials
RSP
IWY
Communication Services
RSP
IWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
IWY
RSP vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSP | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 1.46 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.69 | 4.70 | +5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSP vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and IWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -32.68% | -27.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -16.63% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -23.22% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -32.68% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -32.68% | -6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.47% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -4.75% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 5.17% | -3.10% |
Volatility
RSP vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.59%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 5.68% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 12.59% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 16.14% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 21.57% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 21.03% | -2.66% |
RSP vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RSP and IWY have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than IWY's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSP and IWY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWY has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to RSP (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs IWY's -32.68%.
On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.59% vs 12.18% for RSP. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.59% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP and IWY have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.43% for IWY.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and IWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer