PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSP vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 12.15%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.


RSP

1D
0.91%
1M
3.92%
YTD
10.96%
6M
10.34%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
12.15%

DGRW

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
7.88%
6M
7.92%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSP vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.96%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
7.88%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and DGRW is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.92

The correlation between RSP and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSP vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSP
DGRW

Technology

20.9%
32.1%

Industrials

14.2%
9.9%

Financial Services

13.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
6.7%

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Utilities

5.7%
0.2%

Energy

4.0%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.9%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
10.1%

Technology

RSP
20.9%
DGRW
32.1%

Industrials

RSP
14.2%
DGRW
9.9%

Financial Services

RSP
13.9%
DGRW
11.3%

Healthcare

RSP
11.1%
DGRW
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RSP
10.0%
DGRW
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

RSP
6.4%
DGRW
6.7%

Real Estate

RSP
6.1%
DGRW

-

Utilities

RSP
5.7%
DGRW
0.2%

Energy

RSP
4.0%
DGRW
5.0%

Basic Materials

RSP
3.9%
DGRW
3.3%

Communication Services

RSP
3.9%
DGRW
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSP vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.15

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

9.28

+0.35

RSP vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSP vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-32.04%

-27.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-8.30%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-16.21%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-17.27%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

-32.04%

-7.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.93%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-3.01%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.92%

+0.15%

Volatility

RSP vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.41%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.04%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

10.16%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

14.01%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

16.23%

+2.13%

RSP vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSP vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.47%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSP and DGRW have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to DGRW (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.13% vs 12.15% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.13% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while DGRW is Dividend. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSP and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer