DNLAX vs. AVEMX
DNLAX (BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A) and AVEMX (Ave Maria Value Fund) are both mutual funds - DNLAX is a Energy Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon, while AVEMX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Ave Maria Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, DNLAX returned 12.89%/yr vs 10.68%/yr for AVEMX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DNLAX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for AVEMX.
Performance
DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNLAX achieves a 17.88% return, which is significantly higher than AVEMX's 7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLAX has outperformed AVEMX with an annualized return of 12.89%, while AVEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.
DNLAX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- 17.88%
- 6M
- 17.93%
- 1Y
- 35.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 16.46%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
AVEMX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 17.88% | 14.75% | 0.86% | 1.33% | 33.83% | 38.00% | 6.30% | 16.33% | -17.78% | 13.69% |
AVEMX Ave Maria Value Fund | 7.48% | 2.82% | 21.43% | 3.49% | 4.19% | 25.15% | 6.20% | 20.51% | -8.70% | 17.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNLAX and AVEMX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2003 | 0.75 |
The correlation between DNLAX and AVEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNLAX vs. AVEMX — Risk / Return Rank
DNLAX
AVEMX
DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DNLAX | AVEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.07 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | 0.57 | +3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 1.23 | +12.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNLAX drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than AVEMX's maximum drawdown of -59.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLAX and AVEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNLAX | AVEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.14% | -59.76% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -9.85% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.37% | -18.64% | -13.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.37% | -18.64% | -13.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.45% | -39.76% | -14.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.67% | -9.14% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.52% | -8.61% | -12.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 4.54% | -1.94% |
Volatility
DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX) at 4.67%. This indicates that DNLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNLAX | AVEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 4.67% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 12.38% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 16.77% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 18.50% | +7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.54% | 18.50% | +7.04% |
DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEMX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Dividend Comparison
DNLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than AVEMX's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEMX Ave Maria Value Fund | 0.31% | 0.34% | 8.81% | 4.42% | 1.15% | 8.07% | 3.57% | 5.27% | 10.76% | 7.84% | 0.00% | 0.12% |
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 1.86% | 2.19% | 7.75% | 12.54% | 9.80% | 5.04% | 0.91% | 1.95% | 1.53% | 0.40% | 1.26% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DNLAX and AVEMX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DNLAX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to AVEMX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLAX dropped -69.14% vs AVEMX's -59.76%.
DNLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DNLAX and AVEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer