PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNLAX vs. AVEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNLAX achieves a 17.88% return, which is significantly higher than AVEMX's 7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLAX has outperformed AVEMX with an annualized return of 12.89%, while AVEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


DNLAX

1D
-1.50%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
17.88%
6M
17.93%
1Y
35.36%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
12.89%

AVEMX

1D
0.79%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
7.48%
6M
4.91%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
17.88%14.75%0.86%1.33%33.83%38.00%6.30%16.33%-17.78%13.69%
AVEMX
Ave Maria Value Fund
7.48%2.82%21.43%3.49%4.19%25.15%6.20%20.51%-8.70%17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DNLAX and AVEMX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2003

0.75

The correlation between DNLAX and AVEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNLAX vs. AVEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNLAX
DNLAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DNLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEMX
AVEMX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
AVEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNLAXAVEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.07

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

0.57

+3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

1.23

+12.21

DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the AVEMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNLAX and AVEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLAX drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than AVEMX's maximum drawdown of -59.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLAX and AVEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLAXAVEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.14%

-59.76%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-9.85%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.37%

-18.64%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.37%

-18.64%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.45%

-39.76%

-14.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.67%

-9.14%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.52%

-8.61%

-12.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

4.54%

-1.94%

Volatility

DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX) at 4.67%. This indicates that DNLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLAXAVEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

4.67%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

12.38%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

16.77%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

18.50%

+7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.54%

18.50%

+7.04%

DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEMX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNLAX vs. AVEMX - Dividend Comparison

DNLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than AVEMX's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVEMX
Ave Maria Value Fund
0.31%0.34%8.81%4.42%1.15%8.07%3.57%5.27%10.76%7.84%0.00%0.12%
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
1.86%2.19%7.75%12.54%9.80%5.04%0.91%1.95%1.53%0.40%1.26%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNLAX and AVEMX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNLAX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to AVEMX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLAX dropped -69.14% vs AVEMX's -59.76%.

DNLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNLAX and AVEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer