DNLAX vs. FFGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX).
DNLAX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003. FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DNLAX or FFGCX.
Correlation
The correlation between DNLAX and FFGCX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DNLAX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DNLAX:
-0.34
FFGCX:
0.04
DNLAX:
-0.31
FFGCX:
0.16
DNLAX:
0.96
FFGCX:
1.02
DNLAX:
-0.22
FFGCX:
0.03
DNLAX:
-1.01
FFGCX:
0.11
DNLAX:
6.84%
FFGCX:
5.51%
DNLAX:
20.31%
FFGCX:
16.38%
DNLAX:
-69.14%
FFGCX:
-55.11%
DNLAX:
-30.20%
FFGCX:
-17.78%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNLAX achieves a -8.25% return, which is significantly lower than FFGCX's -1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLAX has underperformed FFGCX with an annualized return of 4.52%, while FFGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.44% annualized return.
DNLAX
-8.25%
-16.62%
-14.16%
-8.33%
8.25%
4.52%
FFGCX
-1.34%
-9.31%
-6.67%
-0.96%
8.87%
5.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DNLAX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGCX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DNLAX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DNLAX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither DNLAX nor FFGCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 0.00% | 2.32% | 1.35% | 1.19% | 0.91% | 1.95% | 1.53% | 0.40% | 1.26% | 0.98% | 0.74% | 0.00% |
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 0.00% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.06% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 2.86% | 3.07% | 2.75% |
Drawdowns
DNLAX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNLAX drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than FFGCX's maximum drawdown of -55.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLAX and FFGCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DNLAX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) at 5.98%. This indicates that DNLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.