PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSNRX vs. RSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSNRX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSNRX achieves a 37.15% return, which is significantly higher than RSINX's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, RSNRX has outperformed RSINX with an annualized return of 13.40%, while RSINX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.


RSNRX

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.67%
YTD
37.15%
6M
44.79%
1Y
105.14%
3Y*
34.30%
5Y*
30.44%
10Y*
13.40%

RSINX

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.69%
YTD
6.67%
6M
8.40%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSNRX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSNRX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund
37.15%69.60%15.94%-8.64%35.02%83.01%27.35%-24.49%-45.81%1.02%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
6.67%6.39%20.81%13.18%-2.02%25.73%-1.68%28.02%-9.55%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RSNRX and RSINX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between RSNRX and RSINX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSNRX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSNRX
RSNRX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RSNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RSNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

RSINX
RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSNRX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSNRXRSINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.76

1.28

+3.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.31

1.88

+3.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.22

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.97

1.75

+7.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.42

6.25

+24.17

RSNRX vs. RSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSNRX Sharpe Ratio is 4.76, which is higher than the RSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSNRX and RSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSNRXRSINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76

1.28

+3.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.50

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.55

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.40

-0.08

Drawdowns

RSNRX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSNRX drawdown since its inception was -89.73%, which is greater than RSINX's maximum drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSNRX and RSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSNRXRSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.73%

-66.11%

-23.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-8.64%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.44%

-20.23%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-23.08%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.27%

-40.86%

-43.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-1.18%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

-10.56%

-15.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.42%

+1.02%

Volatility

RSNRX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) at 2.76%. This indicates that RSNRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSNRXRSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

2.76%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

8.27%

+9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

11.93%

+10.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.93%

19.11%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.52%

19.10%

+12.42%

RSNRX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSNRX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSNRX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison

RSNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than RSINX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
4.18%4.46%10.21%0.77%4.03%15.89%0.30%4.32%17.89%14.37%
RSNRX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund
3.19%4.38%1.65%2.36%0.78%0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSNRX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSNRX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to RSINX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSNRX dropped -89.73% vs RSINX's -66.11%.

RSNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSNRX and RSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer