PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNLAX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNLAX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNLAX achieves a 25.40% return, which is significantly higher than SWPPX's 11.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLAX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 13.80%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


DNLAX

1D
0.99%
1M
1.02%
YTD
25.40%
6M
30.07%
1Y
52.91%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
15.56%
10Y*
13.80%

SWPPX

1D
0.26%
1M
5.22%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.52%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNLAX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
25.40%14.75%0.86%1.33%33.83%38.00%6.30%16.33%-17.78%13.69%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.52%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DNLAX and SWPPX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between DNLAX and SWPPX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNLAX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNLAX
DNLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DNLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNLAX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNLAXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.03

2.54

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

3.44

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.11

3.38

+3.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.45

15.82

+6.63

DNLAX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNLAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNLAX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNLAXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

2.54

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.84

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.86

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.51

-0.15

Drawdowns

DNLAX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLAX drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than SWPPX's maximum drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLAX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLAXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.14%

-55.06%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-8.89%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.37%

-18.74%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.37%

-24.51%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.45%

-33.80%

-20.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

0.00%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.56%

-9.95%

-11.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.90%

+0.48%

Volatility

DNLAX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that DNLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLAXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

2.83%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

8.99%

+4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

11.90%

+6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.64%

16.93%

+8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.51%

18.23%

+7.28%

DNLAX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNLAX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

DNLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
1.75%2.19%7.75%12.54%9.80%5.04%0.91%1.95%1.53%0.40%1.26%0.98%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNLAX and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNLAX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to SWPPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLAX dropped -69.14% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

DNLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNLAX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer