PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNLAX vs. DHMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNLAX vs. DHMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DHMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNLAX achieves a 22.39% return, which is significantly higher than DHMBX's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLAX has outperformed DHMBX with an annualized return of 12.94%, while DHMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.12% annualized return.


DNLAX

1D
1.69%
1M
6.69%
6M
8.33%
YTD
22.39%
1Y
44.28%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
17.71%
10Y*
12.94%
ALL TIME*
10.09%

DHMBX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-2.31%
6M
1.02%
YTD
1.85%
1Y
8.00%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
-0.85%
10Y*
2.12%
ALL TIME*
3.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DNLAX vs. DHMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
22.39%14.75%0.86%1.33%33.83%38.00%6.30%16.33%-17.78%13.69%
DHMBX
BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
1.85%2.64%4.41%6.50%-17.25%5.58%2.85%10.76%1.64%12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DNLAX and DHMBX is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2005

-0.10

The correlation between DNLAX and DHMBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNLAX vs. DHMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DNLAX
DNLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DNLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DHMBX
DHMBX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DHMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DHMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DNLAX vs. DHMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DHMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNLAXDHMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.54

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

2.76

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

10.31

+0.95

DNLAX vs. DHMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the DHMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNLAX and DHMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNLAX vs. DHMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLAX drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than DHMBX's maximum drawdown of -27.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLAX and DHMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLAXDHMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.14%

-27.66%

-41.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-3.33%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.37%

-8.64%

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.37%

-22.90%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.45%

-22.90%

-31.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.13%

-4.19%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

-4.86%

-16.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

0.89%

+2.72%

Volatility

DNLAX vs. DHMBX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DHMBX) at 1.05%. This indicates that DNLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLAXDHMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

1.05%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

2.96%

+11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

3.80%

+15.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.47%

6.18%

+19.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

6.06%

+19.43%

DNLAX vs. DHMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than DHMBX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNLAX vs. DHMBX - Dividend Comparison

DNLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than DHMBX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHMBX
BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.75%5.37%3.96%3.13%3.09%2.47%3.46%4.19%4.13%3.66%4.95%4.50%
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
1.79%2.19%7.75%12.54%9.80%5.04%0.91%1.95%1.53%0.40%1.26%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNLAX and DHMBX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNLAX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to DHMBX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLAX dropped -69.14% vs DHMBX's -27.66%.

DHMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNLAX and DHMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer