RSMC vs. ISCG
RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) and ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. RSMC is actively managed, while ISCG is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMC returned 18.15% vs 39.09% for ISCG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISCG.
Performance
RSMC vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSMC having a 6.73% return and ISCG slightly higher at 6.86%.
RSMC
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCG
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
RSMC vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 6.73% | -1.02% | 0.68% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 6.86% | 12.88% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMC and ISCG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between RSMC and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMC vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
RSMC
ISCG
RSMC vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSMC | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 2.09 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 2.89 | -1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 3.78 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 14.55 | -8.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSMC | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.09 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.40 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
RSMC vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMC and ISCG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMC | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -57.72% | +35.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.49% | -11.43% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -1.06% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -11.70% | +6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.97% | +0.51% |
Volatility
RSMC vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is 5.90%, while iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that RSMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSMC | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 7.10% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 14.02% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 18.90% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 23.02% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 23.14% | -2.33% |
RSMC vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMC vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |