RSMC vs. BKSE
RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) and BKSE (BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. RSMC is actively managed, while BKSE is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMC returned 18.15% vs 41.88% for BKSE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKSE.
Performance
RSMC vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSMC achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than BKSE's 8.16% return.
RSMC
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKSE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 41.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- —
RSMC vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 6.73% | -1.02% | 0.68% |
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 8.16% | 13.09% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMC and BKSE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between RSMC and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMC vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank
RSMC
BKSE
RSMC vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 2.29 | -1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 3.26 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.39 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 4.91 | -2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 17.14 | -11.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.29 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.71 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
RSMC vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum BKSE drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMC and BKSE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -29.08% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.49% | -9.40% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.32% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -9.25% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.69% | +0.79% |
Volatility
RSMC vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) have volatilities of 5.90% and 6.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 6.07% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 13.14% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 18.52% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 21.50% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 22.44% | -1.63% |
RSMC vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMC vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison
RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.22% | 1.26% | 1.55% | 1.38% | 1.50% | 1.17% | 0.82% |