RSI vs. TER
RSI (Rush Street Interactive, Inc.) and TER (Teradyne, Inc.) are both stocks. RSI operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while TER operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 5 years, RSI returned 22.26%/yr vs 24.17%/yr for TER. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RSI vs. TER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSI achieves a 38.50% return, which is significantly lower than TER's 90.11% return.
RSI
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -13.92%
- 6M
- 52.29%
- YTD
- 38.50%
- 1Y
- 33.48%
- 3Y*
- 91.20%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.83%
TER
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -13.96%
- 6M
- 52.66%
- YTD
- 90.11%
- 1Y
- 243.14%
- 3Y*
- 49.54%
- 5Y*
- 24.17%
- 10Y*
- 34.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $95.94M | $82.72M | $81.03M | |
| $1.53B | $1.39B | $1.68B |
RSI vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 38.50% | 41.62% | 205.57% | 25.07% | -78.24% | -23.79% | 125.05% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 90.11% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 36.81% | 91.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSI and TER is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSI and TER has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
RSI:
$6.66B
TER:
$57.56B
RSI:
$0.64
TER:
$7.28
RSI:
42.26
TER:
50.51
RSI:
2.07
TER:
13.02
RSI:
16.16
TER:
0.02
RSI:
$1.37B
TER:
$4.46B
RSI:
$478.00M
TER:
$2.65B
RSI:
$213.86M
TER:
$1.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSI vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank
RSI
TER
RSI vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSI | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.44 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 7.20 | -6.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 22.29 | -19.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSI vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and TER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSI | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.92% | -97.30% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.47% | -33.98% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.04% | -58.18% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.88% | -59.12% | -27.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.05% | -24.01% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.27% | -58.54% | +9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.08% | 10.96% | +2.12% |
Volatility
RSI vs. TER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) is 18.30%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 29.42%. This indicates that RSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSI | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.30% | 29.42% | -11.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.18% | 63.50% | -27.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.99% | 73.88% | -18.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.21% | 52.71% | +9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.54% | 46.68% | +13.86% |
Dividends
RSI vs. TER - Dividend Comparison
RSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
RSI vs. TER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSI vs. TER - Profitability Comparison
RSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 139.66M and revenue of 393.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.62M and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.
RSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 46.23M and revenue of 393.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 437.81M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.
RSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 46.44M and revenue of 393.78M, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 374.53M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSI and TER have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TER has higher volatility (29.42%) compared to RSI (18.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSI dropped -88.92% vs TER's -97.30%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSI and TER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer