RSI vs. COCO
RSI (Rush Street Interactive, Inc.) and COCO (The Vita Coco Company, Inc.) are both stocks. RSI operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while COCO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, RSI returned 110.47%/yr vs 42.82%/yr for COCO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSI vs. COCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSI achieves a 49.72% return, which is significantly lower than COCO's 58.50% return.
RSI
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 49.72%
- 6M
- 49.18%
- 1Y
- 110.19%
- 3Y*
- 110.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.35%
- 10Y*
- —
COCO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- 58.50%
- 6M
- 57.11%
- 1Y
- 139.24%
- 3Y*
- 42.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSI vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 49.72% | 41.62% | 205.57% | 25.07% | -78.24% | -22.17% |
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 58.50% | 43.62% | 43.90% | 85.60% | 23.72% | -27.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSI and COCO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021 | 0.21 |
The correlation between RSI and COCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RSI:
$3.11B
COCO:
$5.08B
RSI:
$0.54
COCO:
$1.38
RSI:
54.15
COCO:
60.89
RSI:
0.10
COCO:
0.51
RSI:
2.36
COCO:
7.67
RSI:
19.53
COCO:
14.43
RSI:
$1.24B
COCO:
$658.62M
RSI:
$433.41M
COCO:
$246.32M
RSI:
$162.04M
COCO:
$100.45M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSI vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank
RSI
COCO
RSI vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSI | COCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 5.86 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 16.41 | -8.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSI vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and COCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSI | COCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.92% | -56.97% | -31.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.47% | -23.23% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.04% | -38.55% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | 0.00% | -3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.11% | -16.76% | -33.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.88% | 8.28% | +4.60% |
Volatility
RSI vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison
Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) has a higher volatility of 12.30% compared to The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) at 9.69%. This indicates that RSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSI | COCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.30% | 9.69% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.71% | 41.61% | -8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.65% | 52.25% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.96% | 56.71% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.55% | 56.71% | +3.84% |
Dividends
RSI vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither RSI nor COCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RSI vs. COCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSI vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison
RSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 132.17M and revenue of 370.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.
COCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.81M and revenue of 179.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
RSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.78M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
COCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
RSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 26.21M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
COCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSI and COCO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSI has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to COCO (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSI dropped -88.92% vs COCO's -56.97%.
COCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSI and COCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer