RSI vs. ANAB
RSI (Rush Street Interactive, Inc.) and ANAB (AnaptysBio, Inc.) are both stocks. RSI operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while ANAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, RSI returned 14.09%/yr vs 27.51%/yr for ANAB. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSI vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSI achieves a 30.83% return, which is significantly lower than ANAB's 58.54% return.
RSI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- 30.83%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 101.91%
- 3Y*
- 99.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
ANAB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -26.57%
- YTD
- 58.54%
- 6M
- 75.64%
- 1Y
- 226.79%
- 3Y*
- 60.13%
- 5Y*
- 27.51%
- 10Y*
- —
RSI vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 30.83% | 41.62% | 205.57% | 25.07% | -78.24% | -23.79% | 125.05% |
ANAB AnaptysBio, Inc. | 58.54% | 266.16% | -38.19% | -30.88% | -10.82% | 61.63% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSI and ANAB is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSI and ANAB has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
RSI:
$2.72B
ANAB:
$1.47B
RSI:
$0.54
ANAB:
-$0.91
RSI:
2.06
ANAB:
6.50
RSI:
17.07
ANAB:
115.33
RSI:
$1.24B
ANAB:
$232.39M
RSI:
$433.41M
ANAB:
$245.59M
RSI:
$162.04M
ANAB:
$52.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSI vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank
RSI
ANAB
RSI vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSI | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.48 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 8.11 | -4.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 20.93 | -12.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSI | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 3.24 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.42 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.23 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
RSI vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, roughly equal to the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and ANAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSI | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.92% | -92.08% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.47% | -28.15% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.04% | -69.32% | +27.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.88% | -69.32% | -17.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -40.21% | +27.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.47% | -64.74% | +14.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.82% | 10.92% | +1.90% |
Volatility
RSI vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison
Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) have volatilities of 11.19% and 11.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSI | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.19% | 11.47% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.03% | 46.57% | -14.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.37% | 70.75% | -19.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.95% | 65.34% | -3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.66% | 75.51% | -14.85% |
Dividends
RSI vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison
Neither RSI nor ANAB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RSI vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RSI and ANAB have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANAB has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to RSI (11.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSI dropped -88.92% vs ANAB's -92.08%.
ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSI and ANAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer