PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANAB vs. AGPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANAB vs. AGPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) and Axe Compute Inc. (AGPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANAB achieves a 58.54% return, which is significantly higher than AGPU's 13.71% return.


ANAB

1D
-0.04%
1M
-26.57%
YTD
58.54%
6M
75.64%
1Y
226.79%
3Y*
60.13%
5Y*
27.51%
10Y*

AGPU

1D
-7.19%
1M
56.35%
YTD
13.71%
6M
47.55%
1Y
-45.31%
3Y*
-46.45%
5Y*
-55.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANAB vs. AGPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
58.54%266.16%-38.19%-30.88%-10.82%61.63%32.31%-74.53%-42.28%
AGPU
Axe Compute Inc.
13.71%-41.87%-75.08%-46.35%-67.79%29.97%-71.94%-57.84%-26.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ANAB and AGPU is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANAB:

$1.47B

AGPU:

$141.70M

EPS

ANAB:

-$0.91

AGPU:

-$25.65

PS Ratio

ANAB:

6.50

AGPU:

589.72

PB Ratio

ANAB:

115.33

AGPU:

2.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANAB:

$232.39M

AGPU:

$125.28K

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANAB:

$245.59M

AGPU:

$52.66K

EBITDA (TTM)

ANAB:

$52.72M

AGPU:

-$232.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AnaptysBio, Inc.

Axe Compute Inc.

Return for Risk

ANAB vs. AGPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANAB
ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AGPU
AGPU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AGPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGPU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AGPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANAB vs. AGPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) and Axe Compute Inc. (AGPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANABAGPUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.24

-0.23

+3.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

1.04

+2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.13

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.11

-0.49

+8.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.93

-0.78

+21.71

ANAB vs. AGPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the AGPU Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANAB and AGPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANABAGPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

-0.23

+3.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.39

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

-0.40

+0.63

Drawdowns

ANAB vs. AGPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANAB drawdown since its inception was -92.08%, smaller than the maximum AGPU drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAB and AGPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANABAGPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.08%

-99.97%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.15%

-92.17%

+64.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.32%

-98.58%

+29.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.32%

-99.70%

+30.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.21%

-99.81%

+59.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-83.27%

+18.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

58.43%

-47.51%

Volatility

ANAB vs. AGPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) is 11.47%, while Axe Compute Inc. (AGPU) has a volatility of 50.14%. This indicates that ANAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANABAGPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

50.14%

-38.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.57%

151.78%

-105.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.75%

201.73%

-130.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.34%

141.04%

-75.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.51%

126.03%

-50.52%

Dividends

ANAB vs. AGPU - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANAB nor AGPU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ANAB vs. AGPU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AnaptysBio, Inc. and Axe Compute Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
25.56M
8.67K
(ANAB) Total Revenue
(AGPU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ANAB and AGPU have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGPU has higher volatility (50.14%) compared to ANAB (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANAB dropped -92.08% vs AGPU's -99.97%.

ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANAB and AGPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer