PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RR.L vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RR.L is traded in GBp, while RYCEY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RYCEY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RR.L achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's 19.94% return. Over the past 10 years, RR.L has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 19.13%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.


RR.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
2.43%
6M
9.61%
YTD
21.52%
1Y
41.69%
3Y*
113.26%
5Y*
72.35%
10Y*
19.13%

RYCEY

1D
-0.30%
1M
2.52%
6M
8.02%
YTD
19.94%
1Y
40.04%
3Y*
114.83%
5Y*
71.87%
10Y*
7.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
21.52%104.79%89.72%221.57%-24.15%10.45%-52.55%-16.52%-0.63%27.42%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
19.94%107.71%91.50%235.61%-26.10%3.50%-82.58%-16.01%-1.85%28.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RR.L and RYCEY is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.86

The correlation between RR.L and RYCEY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RR.L:

£115.21B

RYCEY:

$157.39B

EPS

RR.L:

£1.00

RYCEY:

£0.99

PE Ratio

RR.L:

13.98

RYCEY:

14.15

PEG Ratio

RR.L:

0.03

RYCEY:

0.03

PS Ratio

RR.L:

2.91

RYCEY:

2.95

PB Ratio

RR.L:

42.89

RYCEY:

43.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

RR.L:

£40.12B

RYCEY:

£40.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RR.L:

£10.12B

RYCEY:

£10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

RR.L:

£9.20B

RYCEY:

£8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RR.L vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RR.LRYCEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.98

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

5.33

+0.63

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RR.L and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -90.25%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -98.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and RYCEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RR.LRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.25%

-98.54%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.04%

-20.27%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.78%

-22.51%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.09%

-52.69%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.41%

-93.60%

+4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-69.88%

+62.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.29%

-80.98%

+52.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.97%

7.53%

-0.56%

Volatility

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) is 7.93%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that RR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RR.LRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

8.37%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.31%

31.12%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.75%

36.44%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.91%

41.68%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.60%

47.94%

+0.66%

Dividends

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, which matches RYCEY's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.68%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.41%0.54%1.75%4.06%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.68%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Financials

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
11.72B
11.64B
(RR.L) Total Revenue
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
Values in GBP except per share items

RR.L vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%26.0%28.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
27.4%
27.4%
Portfolio components
RR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

RR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

RR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RR.L and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RR.L and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer