RR.L vs. TSCO
Compare and contrast key facts about Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Tractor Supply Company (TSCO).
Performance
RR.L vs. TSCO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RR.L vs. TSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 4.96% | 104.79% | 89.72% | 221.57% | -24.15% | 10.45% | -52.55% | -16.52% | -0.63% | 30.69% |
TSCO Tractor Supply Company | -9.08% | -10.99% | 27.62% | -7.42% | 7.45% | 73.19% | 47.86% | 9.21% | 20.07% | -8.35% |
Different Trading Currencies
RR.L is traded in GBp, while TSCO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSCO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
RR.L:
£0.99
TSCO:
$2.08
RR.L:
12.18
TSCO:
21.46
RR.L:
0.03
TSCO:
1.64
RR.L:
2.54
TSCO:
1.54
RR.L:
£40.12B
TSCO:
$15.40B
RR.L:
£10.12B
TSCO:
$5.49B
RR.L:
£9.20B
TSCO:
$1.97B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RR.L achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than TSCO's -9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RR.L has outperformed TSCO with an annualized return of 19.21%, while TSCO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.75% annualized return.
RR.L
- 1D
- 6.63%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 56.81%
- 3Y*
- 101.66%
- 5Y*
- 62.18%
- 10Y*
- 19.21%
TSCO
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -13.86%
- YTD
- -9.08%
- 6M
- -18.31%
- 1Y
- -19.89%
- 3Y*
- -2.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RR.L vs. TSCO — Risk / Return Rank
RR.L
TSCO
RR.L vs. TSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Tractor Supply Company (TSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RR.L | TSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | -0.72 | +2.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | -0.90 | +3.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.90 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | -0.74 | +4.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | -1.57 | +12.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RR.L | TSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | -0.72 | +2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.50 | 0.27 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.61 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between RR.L and TSCO is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RR.L vs. TSCO - Dividend Comparison
RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than TSCO's 2.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.87% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 2.99% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
TSCO Tractor Supply Company | 2.09% | 1.84% | 1.66% | 1.92% | 1.64% | 0.87% | 1.07% | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
RR.L vs. TSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -89.61%, which is greater than TSCO's maximum drawdown of -50.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and TSCO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RR.L | TSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.61% | -76.15% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.82% | -28.29% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.09% | -28.29% | -26.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.41% | -47.58% | -41.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -28.29% | +16.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.26% | -17.31% | -21.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 12.69% | -7.25% |
Volatility
RR.L vs. TSCO - Volatility Comparison
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a higher volatility of 16.03% compared to Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) at 6.53%. This indicates that RR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RR.L | TSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.03% | 6.53% | +9.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.32% | 19.45% | +3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.11% | 27.89% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.39% | 27.44% | +13.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.17% | 29.51% | +18.66% |
Financials
RR.L vs. TSCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Tractor Supply Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RR.L vs. TSCO - Profitability Comparison
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
TSCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 3.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.4%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
TSCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported an operating income of 342.71M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
TSCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported a net income of 259.27M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.