RR.L vs. AVIO.MI
Compare and contrast key facts about Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Avio S.p.A. (AVIO.MI).
Performance
RR.L vs. AVIO.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RR.L vs. AVIO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | -1.57% | 104.79% | 89.72% | 221.57% | -24.15% | 10.45% | -52.55% | -16.52% | -0.63% | 30.69% |
AVIO.MI Avio S.p.A. | 13.17% | 123.41% | 59.94% | -13.36% | -12.64% | -2.51% | -13.56% | 21.04% | -14.47% | 32.45% |
Different Trading Currencies
RR.L is traded in GBp, while AVIO.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AVIO.MI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RR.L achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than AVIO.MI's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RR.L has outperformed AVIO.MI with an annualized return of 18.44%, while AVIO.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.32% annualized return.
RR.L
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- 53.03%
- 3Y*
- 97.40%
- 5Y*
- 60.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.44%
AVIO.MI
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 6M
- -37.93%
- 1Y
- 101.89%
- 3Y*
- 53.49%
- 5Y*
- 23.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RR.L vs. AVIO.MI — Risk / Return Rank
RR.L
AVIO.MI
RR.L vs. AVIO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Avio S.p.A. (AVIO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RR.L | AVIO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.55 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.19 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 1.63 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 3.10 | +5.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RR.L | AVIO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.55 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.46 | 0.56 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.43 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RR.L and AVIO.MI is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RR.L vs. AVIO.MI - Dividend Comparison
RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than AVIO.MI's 0.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 2.99% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
AVIO.MI Avio S.p.A. | 0.36% | 0.41% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RR.L vs. AVIO.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -89.61%, which is greater than AVIO.MI's maximum drawdown of -62.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and AVIO.MI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RR.L | AVIO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.61% | -63.00% | -26.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.82% | -63.00% | +44.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.09% | -63.00% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.41% | -63.00% | -26.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.95% | -48.76% | +31.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.27% | -18.33% | -20.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | 33.05% | -27.58% |
Volatility
RR.L vs. AVIO.MI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) is 14.70%, while Avio S.p.A. (AVIO.MI) has a volatility of 24.80%. This indicates that RR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVIO.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RR.L | AVIO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.70% | 24.80% | -10.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.42% | 52.11% | -29.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.62% | 65.81% | -33.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.31% | 41.59% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.13% | 35.26% | +12.87% |
Financials
RR.L vs. AVIO.MI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Avio S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities