RR.L vs. COST.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Costain Group plc (COST.L).
Performance
RR.L vs. COST.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RR.L vs. COST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 4.96% | 104.79% | 89.72% | 221.57% | -24.15% | 10.45% | -52.55% | -16.52% | -0.63% | 30.69% |
COST.L Costain Group plc | 18.92% | 54.64% | 69.69% | 62.13% | -26.26% | -9.80% | -62.86% | -46.97% | -30.48% | 35.94% |
Fundamentals
RR.L:
£101.41B
COST.L:
£523.82M
RR.L:
£0.99
COST.L:
£0.25
RR.L:
12.18
COST.L:
7.59
RR.L:
2.54
COST.L:
0.22
RR.L:
37.20
COST.L:
2.03
RR.L:
£40.12B
COST.L:
£2.30B
RR.L:
£10.12B
COST.L:
£216.60M
RR.L:
£9.20B
COST.L:
£110.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RR.L achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than COST.L's 18.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RR.L has outperformed COST.L with an annualized return of 19.21%, while COST.L has yielded a comparatively lower -3.96% annualized return.
RR.L
- 1D
- 6.63%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 56.81%
- 3Y*
- 101.66%
- 5Y*
- 62.18%
- 10Y*
- 19.21%
COST.L
- 1D
- 4.63%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 18.92%
- 6M
- 40.38%
- 1Y
- 81.50%
- 3Y*
- 54.04%
- 5Y*
- 27.34%
- 10Y*
- -3.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RR.L vs. COST.L — Risk / Return Rank
RR.L
COST.L
RR.L vs. COST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Costain Group plc (COST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RR.L | COST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 2.16 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.75 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.16 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 8.18 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RR.L | COST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.16 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.50 | 0.67 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | -0.07 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | -0.00 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between RR.L and COST.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RR.L vs. COST.L - Dividend Comparison
RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than COST.L's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.87% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 2.99% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
COST.L Costain Group plc | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.13% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.15% | 4.30% | 2.65% | 3.07% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
RR.L vs. COST.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -89.61%, roughly equal to the maximum COST.L drawdown of -92.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and COST.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RR.L | COST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.61% | -92.88% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.82% | -25.66% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.09% | -49.69% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.41% | -92.88% | +3.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -56.57% | +45.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.26% | -49.32% | +10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 9.93% | -4.49% |
Volatility
RR.L vs. COST.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) is 16.03%, while Costain Group plc (COST.L) has a volatility of 19.56%. This indicates that RR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RR.L | COST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.03% | 19.56% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.32% | 25.95% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.11% | 37.51% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.39% | 40.94% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.17% | 52.81% | -4.64% |
Financials
RR.L vs. COST.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Costain Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RR.L vs. COST.L - Profitability Comparison
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
COST.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costain Group plc reported a gross profit of 61.40M and revenue of 520.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.8%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
COST.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costain Group plc reported an operating income of 30.50M and revenue of 520.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
COST.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costain Group plc reported a net income of 23.10M and revenue of 520.30M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.