PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RR.L vs. RNMBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RR.L is traded in GBp, while RNMBY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RNMBY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RR.L achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -23.28% return. Over the past 10 years, RR.L has underperformed RNMBY with an annualized return of 21.22%, while RNMBY has yielded a comparatively higher 38.19% annualized return.


RR.L

1D
0.40%
1M
5.09%
YTD
10.33%
6M
16.29%
1Y
42.96%
3Y*
105.84%
5Y*
64.29%
10Y*
21.22%

RNMBY

1D
-0.38%
1M
-15.78%
YTD
-23.28%
6M
-22.35%
1Y
-32.32%
3Y*
73.21%
5Y*
71.32%
10Y*
38.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
10.33%104.79%89.72%221.57%-24.15%10.45%-52.55%-15.32%0.80%32.64%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
-23.28%169.60%103.32%55.19%148.40%-13.02%-4.91%23.27%-25.19%81.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RR.L and RNMBY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2012

0.28

The correlation between RR.L and RNMBY shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (10 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RR.L:

£106.14B

RNMBY:

$64.50B

EPS

RR.L:

£0.99

RNMBY:

$3.56

PE Ratio

RR.L:

12.74

RNMBY:

77.54

PEG Ratio

RR.L:

0.03

RNMBY:

3.54

PS Ratio

RR.L:

2.66

RNMBY:

5.84

PB Ratio

RR.L:

38.93

RNMBY:

12.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

RR.L:

£40.12B

RNMBY:

$9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RR.L:

£10.12B

RNMBY:

$4.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

RR.L:

£9.20B

RNMBY:

$1.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RR.L vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RNMBY
RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RR.LRNMBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.90

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

-0.73

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

-1.67

+7.96

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the RNMBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RR.L and RNMBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RR.LRNMBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

-0.71

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.53

1.63

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.94

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.85

-0.51

Drawdowns

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -89.20%, which is greater than RNMBY's maximum drawdown of -61.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and RNMBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RR.LRNMBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.20%

-61.66%

-27.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.04%

-44.44%

+25.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.78%

-44.44%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.09%

-44.44%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.20%

-61.66%

-27.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-40.27%

+33.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-14.45%

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.81%

19.38%

-12.57%

Volatility

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) is 13.28%, while Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) has a volatility of 16.98%. This indicates that RR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RR.LRNMBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.28%

16.98%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.84%

33.56%

-2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.95%

45.84%

-9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.02%

43.90%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.57%

40.67%

+7.90%

Dividends

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison

RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than RNMBY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
0.98%0.49%0.96%1.46%1.82%1.72%1.56%1.36%1.47%2.06%2.97%0.53%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.75%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.43%3.07%1.83%4.31%

Financials

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B202120222023202420252026
11.72B
1.97B
(RR.L) Total Revenue
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RR.L values in GBp, RNMBY values in USD

RR.L vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Rheinmetall AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
27.4%
21.9%
Portfolio components
RR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

RR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

RR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RR.L and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RR.L and RNMBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer