PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RYCEY vs. PPA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and PPA is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

RYCEY vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
22.76%
11.24%
RYCEY
PPA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RYCEY:

2.70

PPA:

1.91

Sortino Ratio

RYCEY:

3.39

PPA:

2.58

Omega Ratio

RYCEY:

1.41

PPA:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

RYCEY:

1.61

PPA:

3.31

Martin Ratio

RYCEY:

21.80

PPA:

10.54

Ulcer Index

RYCEY:

3.92%

PPA:

2.66%

Daily Std Dev

RYCEY:

31.58%

PPA:

14.67%

Max Drawdown

RYCEY:

-91.67%

PPA:

-57.37%

Current Drawdown

RYCEY:

-9.21%

PPA:

-7.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 3.67%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.


RYCEY

YTD

0.14%

1M

-4.43%

6M

22.76%

1Y

83.03%

5Y*

13.83%

10Y*

3.67%

PPA

YTD

0.31%

1M

-2.15%

6M

11.24%

1Y

28.92%

5Y*

11.12%

10Y*

13.92%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RYCEY vs. PPA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RYCEY is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RYCEY is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RYCEY is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RYCEY is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RYCEY is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RYCEY is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PPA is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PPA is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PPA is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PPA is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PPA is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PPA is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RYCEY vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.701.91
The chart of Sortino ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 3.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.392.58
The chart of Omega ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.411.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.613.31
The chart of Martin ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 21.80, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0021.8010.54
RYCEY
PPA

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and PPA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.003.004.005.006.007.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.70
1.91
RYCEY
PPA

Dividends

RYCEY vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%128.87%1.68%1.50%1.29%1.96%4.08%2.74%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.61%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%0.62%

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -91.67%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and PPA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.21%
-7.31%
RYCEY
PPA

Volatility

RYCEY vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) at 4.94%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.96%
4.94%
RYCEY
PPA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab