PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RQI vs. UTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RQI vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RQI having a 18.57% return and UTF slightly lower at 17.84%. Over the past 10 years, RQI has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 8.61%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.


RQI

1D
1.25%
1M
1.07%
YTD
18.57%
6M
20.22%
1Y
15.91%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
8.61%

UTF

1D
0.59%
1M
2.71%
YTD
17.84%
6M
19.68%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQI vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
18.57%2.07%8.04%15.74%-31.07%56.64%-9.28%54.62%-11.11%11.73%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
17.84%9.93%22.37%-3.83%-9.60%17.91%6.93%42.74%-9.87%34.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RQI and UTF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2004

0.52

The correlation between RQI and UTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RQI:

$1.74B

UTF:

$2.65B

EPS

RQI:

$1.09

UTF:

$6.79

PE Ratio

RQI:

11.96

UTF:

4.03

PS Ratio

RQI:

4.85

UTF:

6.85

PB Ratio

RQI:

1.07

UTF:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

RQI:

$360.06M

UTF:

$387.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RQI:

$283.39M

UTF:

$388.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

RQI:

$130.74M

UTF:

$765.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RQI vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQI
RQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UTF
UTF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQI vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RQIUTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.20

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.37

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

2.79

+0.96

RQI vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQI and UTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RQI vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQI drawdown since its inception was -91.59%, which is greater than UTF's maximum drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQI and UTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RQIUTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.59%

-72.62%

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-10.33%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-21.06%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.06%

-30.28%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.12%

-52.53%

-6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

0.00%

-3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-10.36%

-7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

5.05%

-1.07%

Volatility

RQI vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.43%. This indicates that RQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RQIUTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

2.43%

+3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

8.40%

+4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

12.40%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

18.33%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.96%

23.34%

+3.62%

Dividends

RQI vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

RQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, more than UTF's 6.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
8.86%9.54%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
6.87%7.62%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%

Financials

RQI vs. UTF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
55.28M
144.46M
(RQI) Total Revenue
(UTF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RQI and UTF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RQI has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to UTF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQI dropped -91.59% vs UTF's -72.62%.

UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQI and UTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer